Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jennifer Lea Spicer's avatar

Please have Daniel read the article on ZEON by Michael Bauwens here on substack.

Expand full comment
Anarcasper's avatar

I love how you’ve woven the elements into the power modalities. The metaphor is powerful. I do wonder, though, if the way you’re framing Power Over in the Wood/Freedom to Reframe section might blur an important boundary in the Coordination as Power framework. In my model, Power Over arises from specific patterns of control, usually where coordination constrains rather than enables freedom. Reframing oppressive paradigms, to me, is an act of Power To or Power With, it’s generative, not dominative. So I wonder whether associating this liberatory reframing with Power Over might obscure how deeply structural Power Over really is.

In my opinion a more apt elemental and metaphoric symbology would be stone. I will use your format to explain.

STONE - Freedom to Shape Worlds (Power Over)

Form through Imposition

Stone is the element that sets form, not fluid, not yielding. It holds shape, weight, and boundary. This is not the freedom of motion, but the freedom of imposition. The capacity to declare: “This is the shape things take.”

Power Over, at its core, is not just domination. It is the act of fixing form, of defining contours within which others must move. This power becomes oppressive when it crushes difference, enforces hierarchy, or denies movement.

But stone is not only what crushes. It is also what builds. When held ethically, Power Over is the architectural power, the capacity to make forms visible, structural, and enduring. It is the power to define defaults, to channel flow, to shape landscapes.

The shadow is rigidity.

The potential is constructive sovereignty, the responsibility to shape worlds without sealing them.

“Stone sets the frame, but it must remember the field from which it rose. To shape is not to dominate, it is to offer form without erasure.”

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts